It is only one side of the equation to avoid or reduce the chemistry known to cause cancer. The other is to prevent factors supporting cancer. These; chemicals, food, and even their balance, if their balance is broken, can cause cancer cells to grow. The other critical part of the puzzle is to strengthen your body’s defense. Carcinogen is not something new to discover. They are found in nature, even in foods that support health, but that does not mean that they will necessarily constitute a danger. Because the body is designed to detoxify carcinogens. The problem is, your body starts to defend when you fall down hard and you are exposed to too many carcinogens.
For this reason, as you can see, it is of utmost importance to strengthen your immune system and to detoxify the carcinogens of your liver. Avoiding known carcinogens, eating properly, keeping your hormones in balance, improving the detoxification potential of your liver, and strengthening your immune system are all things that you can do. Such a precautionary strategy is essential to prevent cancer recurrence and to reverse the growth process of cancer cells. The strong findings of this are indications that you can say no to cancer.
Do we win the war on cancer?
Unfortunately, we do not go into action when we know how to reduce the cancer risk. The decline in lung cancer cases in many countries, as the number of smokers is getting smaller, is only one remarkable but insufficient effort in this area. Cancer of the uterus and cancer of the stomach are also the ones that are inferior. However, the overall rate of cancer targeting one of three people and causing the death of one in four cases is still rising.
The main concern is the increase in hormone-related cancers. These cancers, which target hormone sensitive tissues, are the prostate and testis in men; in women, breast, cervix, ovary and uterus (endometrium) cancer.
Take breast cancer for example. One in nine women in the United States and one in eight women in the United Kingdom are breast cancer. Breast cancer cases in the UK have increased by more than 50% in the last 25 years. Prostate cancer has tripled in the last 30 years. As a matter of fact, people are getting caught in these cancers earlier and more often than they were ten years ago. This is most likely due to changes in the diet and the effects of environmental toxins.
In 1992, according to a report by 69 respected medical experts and scientists in the United States, “More than five million Americans have lost their lives in recent decades, and the fact that most of these deaths are actually preventable is increasing. is to protest the failure of the policies of the relevant authorities. In a March 2010 briefing by the American Medical Diet, it was reported that new cancer diagnoses between 1999 and 2006 showed a decrease of less than 1 percent. Almost half of this decline was probably attributed to decreased lung cancer diagnoses by anti-smoking campaigns.
3 At least one out of two men and at least one out of three women will be diagnosed with cancer this year. In 2009, cancer cases in the United States were reported to be more than 1.5 million, and deaths from cancer more than 560,000. Given the $ 100 billion the American government has spent on cancer research for the last four decades, this result is not quite successful.
Are we ever trying?
Well, is there something that has changed in the situation? A small fraction of the money allocated to the search is spent on prevention; most of the source goes to traditional treatment using surgery, chemotherapy or radiotherapy. Even cancer-related deaths have been reduced by improvements in the treatment of cancer. Today, a breast cancer patient can survive longer than 20 years ago. But what these statistics do not add up to is that people now seem to live longer, since diagnoses can be made earlier.
Conventional therapy, which is too out-of-concept as a concept (which essentially involves cutting out the cancerous part, burning or giving drugs), does not really lean on the factors underlying the transformation of cells into cancer cells. However, this should be the first point to be targeted.
Cancer prevention is clearly a better option than treatment, but the reality is that cancer prevention does not make a profit. Interestingly, pharmaceutical companies provide almost no incentive to use the resources they provide to address the main causes of cancer (ie, the effects of today’s diet, lifestyle, and cancer-causing chemicals). Before donating your money to such institutions, find out how much of the source is actually transferred to drug-free prevention research.
Fortunately, there is also a lucrative side of it; there is also a list of factors that all of us are known to increase the risk of cancer, which we can do best to avoid. You will see these factors and what we need to do about them.